Seriously, on almost every thread people moan about how the newest sequels screw up the franchise and stuff,
Like Red Alert 3, I liked it, with all the stuff and shit,
Or Far Cry 2, it's a great game, the only minus is the malaria crap,
Or Red Faction 2, never played it, but people tend to hate it,
And so goes on with the list...
So I came up with this little diagram:
1st game:Awesome to many people
2nd game:Shit or just ok
3rd game:People hate it
And so on,
Also, so what if they try new stuff? sequels are supposed to be sequels with new story, plot and enemies, not just remakes with better graphics
So, why exacly?