1. Post #1
    Emperor Scorpious II's Avatar
    February 2009
    33,808 Posts
    What's the worst case scenario of an Israeli air strike on Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities? Below is what I came up with. I think each of these scenarios is plausible in its own right, and that all could well ensue

    [release]1. Iran is now threatening to strike at any third country in the region that aided Israel in an airstrike on Iran. The aftermath is therefore likely to be further conflict in the region.

    [release]2. Oil prices will spike. I imagine you could easily see $150 a barrel or maybe even more. This development could throw the U.S. and Europe back into deep recession.

    [release]3. Hezbollah would likely launch rockets, causing at least severe inconvenience to some 1/4 of the Israeli public, which might well have to move house again, and possibly much worse if Hizbullah is able, as they claim, to target toxic gas storage in Haifa or even the reactor at Dimona with modified Chinese silkworms.

    It is not clear that the Israeli public would appreciate all that trouble; they didn’t, in former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s case (his 2006 Lebanon war was extremely unpopular and his party is no longer in power). A Hezbollah official said on Sunday that Hezbollah would be willing to go to war with Israel if Syria were attacked, so it seems likely the same thing would hold true with regard to Iran.

    [release]4. Israel would destroy Lebanon infrastructure in revenge for Hezbollah rocket attacks

    [release]5. The Syria uprising would be over with. It would be impossible for the Syrian National Council to continue to oppose the government and risk being tagged as genuinely Israeli agents. The Baath would be consolidated in Syria.[/release]
    [release]6. An Iran-Baghdad-Damascus-Beirut axis would be strengthened, allowing for resupply of Hezbollah capabilities. Beirut would be pushed into arms of the new axis. Gulf oil states and Iraq and Iran would quickly rebuild Lebanon.

    [release]7. Iraq would be radicalized. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in Iraq would have to support Hezbollah and Lebanon or risk losing face inside al-Da’wa and losing backing in parliament of Sadr, al-Hakim and other Shiite religious forces. Al-Maliki has already given, as a reason for supporting al-Assad, the danger that Israel will take advantage of turmoil in the Fertile Crescent. Iraq would likely use its oil wealth to help rebuild Lebanon and al-Maliki’s Islamic Mission Party (al-Da’wa al-Islamiya), which helped create Hezbollah, would strengthen relations with it. You could see cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army supply men and arms to Hizbullah in Lebanon, as well.

    [release]8. The European left and liberals would be horrified and unlike in the past could well take action. Remember that the scenario is that Israel, having gone rogue and poisoned Isfahan and maybe other populations with toxic chemicals and radioactivity, went on to destroy Lebanon’s airport, harbor, electricity plants, oil refineries, roads, bridges, etc.

    Ireland, Norway, and possibly some other European governments, plus large numbers of European civil society organizations and unions might well slap economic boycotts and sanctions on Israel (50% of Israel’s trade is with Europe).

    Significant negative measures by the European Union are not impossible, including in area of scientific and technological exchange. In my view, the Campaign for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement in Europe would become a wave and once that happens, it could have a long term impact on the Israeli economy.

    [release]9. The region’s diplomatic dynamics could be changed. The possibility exists of a rupture between Israel and Turkey. It is also possible that Egypt will terminate the Camp David peace accords. The Egyptian military won’t care about the strike on Iran, but the Egyptian public would be horrified by that and by the likely third Lebanon war. The Muslim Brotherhood, now dominant in the Egyptian parliament, would have to react strongly or risk losing credibility in the eyes of the Egyptian public.

    [release]10. Over succeeding years, significant Israeli out-migration could occur by Israelis with sufficient education and training to find jobs elsewhere, who became convinced that the Middle East will just never settle down and be a pleasant environment for them.

    This development would strengthen the internal position of the Palestinian-Israelis and possibly of the Haredim (who are probably more committed to staying and toughing it out), and weaken the Ashkenazi secular elite. Ironically, Barak has admitted that some of the impetus for preventing a nuclear Iran is to forestall this out-migration scenario, but he doesn’t seem to realize that a strike on Iran could actually have a similar demographic outcome if the region doesn’t take it lying down.

    It seems obvious to me that if all these developments actually occurred,they would be much worse for Israel than if Iran actually did start a weapons program and Iran and Israel replicated on a regional scale the Mutually Assured Destruction of the U.S.-Soviet standoff of an earlier era.

    Source: http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn....el/?hpt=hp_bn2
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP United States Show Events Dumb Dumb x 5Informative Informative x 2Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  2. Post #2
    Gold Member
    plokoon9619's Avatar
    February 2008
    2,403 Posts
    World War III folks, right here, right now!
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Dumb Dumb x 4Disagree Disagree x 3 (list)

  3. Post #3
    ask me about my title
    Elfy's Avatar
    August 2009
    2,770 Posts
    Extra extra, war with Iran would cost too much!

  4. Post #4
    Gold Member
    Lizzrd's Avatar
    December 2009
    9,142 Posts
    World War III folks, right here, right now!
    More like, Middle Eastern Crisis Episode XVIIVI
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Norway Show Events Funny Funny x 14Agree Agree x 5 (list)

  5. Post #5
    JesterUK's Avatar
    November 2008
    6,719 Posts
    More like, Middle Eastern Crisis Episode XVIIVI
    In 3D
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United States Show Events Starred Starred x 16Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  6. Post #6
    And in the end, its the poor Israelis and Iranian people that suffer.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Singapore Show Events Friendly Friendly x 6Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  7. Post #7
    Gold Member
    Hidole555's Avatar
    July 2009
    5,290 Posts
    Some of these reasons are more about how this would screw over everyone else.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows Vista United States Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  8. Post #8
    Gold Member
    Scrimp's Avatar
    January 2012
    1,179 Posts
    This will cause some serious buggery to the world.

  9. Post #9
    Gold Member
    Nikota's Avatar
    September 2010
    8,233 Posts
    We really need to just cut ties with Israel and let them deal with it on their own. They got themselves into this mess and they need to deal with the consequences of their actions.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events Agree Agree x 2Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  10. Post #10

    September 2011
    224 Posts
    Only in cinemas.

  11. Post #11
    June 2005
    14,184 Posts
    Only in cinemas.
    The conflict will not be televised.

    The conflict will not be televised.

    The conflict will not be televised.

    'Cos brother, the conflict will be live.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 United Kingdom Show Events Artistic Artistic x 3Starred Starred x 1 (list)

  12. Post #12
    Viking Chest hair simulator 2012
    TheDestroyerOfall's Avatar
    June 2009
    3,038 Posts
    Why does everyone think the world will end? We made it through the cold war without any nuclear holocaust. We made it through the cuban missile crisis, Compared to this, This is a pile of crap.

  13. Post #13
    Gold Member
    ExplodingGuy's Avatar
    December 2009
    6,580 Posts
    The conflict will not be televised.

    The conflict will not be televised.

    The conflict will not be televised.

    'Cos brother, the conflict will be live.
    Will there be audience participation?

  14. Post #14
    Title Attrition Belligerent

    November 2009
    1,961 Posts
    Will there be audience participation?
    load up on guns bring your friends