And some guns are better in close quarters and some are better at long range. You can't say that X is best.
It's going to be similar to BF3. After release, they're just going to ship out 3-4 DLC's that take half a year to develop for 3-4 maps and 4-5(?) weapons, within a couple months after it's initial release.
So wagering its going to be shown sometime today since the PS4 reveal is today, and Sony cooperates with EA when it comes to Battlefield.. they might show a teaser or a full length trailer at the reveal or something.
I'm betting its going to visually look the same and include Ruskies and Americans and be based in current times.
BF3's awesome and I very much doubt BF4 will be less awesome.
No thanks, considering bf3 isn't get any more dlcs its the perfect game atm.
Coming on October 23rd, 2013
Released on PC, PS3, Xbox 360, and will be one of the first games released for “next-gen consoles”
Running on Frostbite 2.0 engine
Commander System returns, supports motion tracking and voice control
Improved Battlelog integration and stat-tracking
Your profile can be linked with other devices
Auto login, internet connection always required
Will support cloud saves
The game will supposedly be easier to pick up and play—supposedly for the benefit of “Call of Duty players”
Support for video recording / playback / sharing
Have “gem store for DLC and other such stuff”
Three factions: USA, Russia, China
Ability to create female soldiers
PC, next PlayStation, next Xbox versions will support 64-player maps
PS3 and Xbox 360 versions will support less players
PC, next PlayStation, next Xbox versions will run at 60fps
Demo video already being shown internally at EA
Battlefield 4 will use 80% of the power of the Frostbite 2.0 engine, where BF3 used 30%~40%
I wonder how China is going to fit in. Plot twist: China allies with Russia and they conquer earth.
Looks like this might be what they're talking of.
I would really like a Bad Company 3 some time soon. It's time we step away from having a super serious storyline and bring back the boys from B-Company.
I will keep on saying this. A Battlefield 4 feels far too early. But at this time, Bad Company 3 feels just right.
quote from nostradamus: bf4 launch (everyone and their dog buys it), dlc 1 is launched (everyone buys it), dlc 2 (even more people buy it), bf4 premium is launched (everyone and their dog/cat/mouse buys it), then dlc 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + last dlc. After that, the cycle starts over.
Am I the only one who would like another WWII Battlefield game? I can't get enough of the first one really and i love the WWII setting.
Page not found?
so... Why is Battlefield 4 not a sequel to battlefield 2142?
Meanwhile, BF3 Premium is on sale for $27. I might get it. Very curious to play the new maps
Seriously would of preferred a 2143, just really anything to spice it up.
Wow, 900 guests.
All for the image Novangel posted
T-They do realise that was from Destroid?
NeoGaf my bad.
Why are you ruining it? sshh
seriously people the whole "oh no next gen is forcing you to be always online!!!" shit is getting ridiculous. Most games even hinting at this are online play oriented games, services are things that only require internet to operate when their point is to do something with the internet, and gamers like ourselves probably don't leave the internet as it is so what even changes
Well as long as they add better thing's in this it would be better. BF3 was great but they should have better servers and more content and stop striving for people's money and toss the community aside and concentrate just on way's to get money from people. DICE/EA have great games they just need to listen to the community and do some finishing touches on the game and they will finish with a great product, which they already got, but will be better and have a greater communtiy base.