[Zillamaster55]

Zeke129 posted:

Enemy casualties:

niggerjailbait? Really?

[The Mighty Boat]

Rubs10 posted:

If someone could just take a moment and explain to me how it's harming anyone, I'd appreciate it.

u cant see whats wrong with photographing kids who are enjoying themselves on the beach and sharing them with a pedophile network

what

[Bawbag]

Rubs10 posted:

If someone could just take a moment and explain to me how it's harming anyone, I'd appreciate it.

So if I were to take a photo of you and your 7 year old sister, and then upload it for millions to splooge over, you'd be cool with that?

....Really?

[Daniel Smith]

thisispain posted:

does 4Chan allow child pornography?

2Chan might.

[Mabus]

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

is he another complete left-winger like zeke who won't listen to sense when it smacks them in the face?

Bawbag posted:

That isn't trolling, it's a serious question of her character. If she likes men with muscle, which her rapist was undoubtedly; the question of whether or not her claim is true comes into question.

at least zeke isn't functionally dead in the cerebral cortex

[Drsalvador]

BlkDucky posted:

Nope. But boards like /b/ move so fast that there's not much point even removing it, it gets deleted automatically so fast.

On my very few trips through /b/ i've imagined it like a london train station at rush hour.

Basically if you stand still you're going to get run over by a trolley.

[Elecbullet]

thisispain posted:

at least zeke isn't functionally dead in the cerebral cortex

Hmm, it seems defense of rapists tends to be somewhat of a defining trait of us Zeke haters

[thisispain]

Elecbullet posted:

Hmm, it seems defense of rapists tends to be somewhat of a defining trait of us Zeke haters

what about comparing sex-change surgery to black people suing to get fried chicken

[Bawbag]

thisispain posted:

at least zeke isn't functionally dead in the cerebral cortex

Now let me tell you the story of the girl who cried rape.


But in all seriousness: You'd have to be an idiot not to think of the boy who cried wolf when a women acts like she did.

thisispain posted:

what about comparing sex-change surgery to black people suing to get fried chicken

My point was sex change surgery is a desire. I don't want my taxes paying for people's desires; only people's needs, a topic your view is very skewed on.

[Drsalvador]

Elecbullet posted:

Hmm, it seems defense of rapists tends to be somewhat of a defining trait of us Zeke haters

He's had a point at times but overall his post quality is awful.

Edited:

Bawbag posted:

Now let me tell you the story of the girl who cried rape.


But in all seriousness: You'd have to be an idiot not to think of the boy who cried wolf when a women acts like she did.

are you seriously
justifyin-

wow.

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

Now let me tell you the story of the girl who cried rape.


But in all seriousness: You'd have to be an idiot not to think of the boy who cried wolf when a women acts like she did.

"when a women"
boy who cried wolf is very different from

If she likes men with muscle, which her rapist was undoubtedly; the question of whether or not her claim is true comes into question.

and you'd have to be an idiot to say shit with zero understanding of the issue: http://www.rainn.org/statistics

[Rubs10]

Bawbag posted:

So if I were to take a photo of you and your 7 year old sister, and then upload it for millions to splooge over, you'd be cool with that?

....Really?

Would it harm me in any way?

[The Mighty Boat]

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

lol ok this is not how a normal, well-adjusted human being thinks

[Wootman]

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

Won't you be the least bit creeped out?

[Bawbag]

thisispain posted:

and you'd have to be an idiot to say shit with zero understanding of the issue: http://www.rainn.org/statistics

If she had really been raped; I would think she wouldn't have been so public about it. Giving the amazing atheist oh so much more to attack is simply stupid.

Secondly, she wouldn't have commented on her own preference in men to insult him, as it fits nicely in the line of what you would imagine the stereotypical rapist.

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

So what if all of your photos went viral with your university/school/playgroup acquaintances - And then you got the utter piss ripped out of you, spiraling you into depression before you jump infront of a train?

[Drsalvador]

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

You're a goddamn moron. Any sort of child sexual abuse regardless of its physical harm to the child is pure unbridled evil. It's worse than rape, it's worse than murder, it's worse than eating a baby. once you sexually abuse kids, there is no way back. it is the horizon of the moral event horizon.

[Rubs10]

Wootman posted:

Won't you be the least bit creeped out?

Maybe, but I don't ask to ban things if I'm creeped out by them.

[Drsalvador]

Bawbag posted:

If she had really been raped; I would think she wouldn't have been so public about it. Giving the amazing atheist oh so much more to attack is simply stupid.

Secondly, she wouldn't have commented on her own preference in men to insult him, as it fits nicely in the line of what you would imagine the stereotypical rapist.

holy fucking shit you are despicable.

[AngryChairR]

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

This post screams Paedophile to me. Are you a Paedophile?

EDIT: I don't understand how you could not be bothered by it. And it isn't even about whether or not it bothers them, it's about the issue as a whole - child exploitation can only rise by taking that attitude.

[The Mighty Boat]

Bawbag posted:

If she had really been raped; I would think she wouldn't have been so public about it. Giving the amazing atheist oh so much more to attack is simply stupid.

Secondly, she wouldn't have commented on her own preference in men to insult him, as it fits nicely in the line of what you would imagine the stereotypical rapist.

genuinely a terrible person

Edited:

btw guys please take ur little slapfight to somewhere more private thanks

[thisispain]

Rubs10 posted:

Would it harm me in any way?

this isn't even relevant.
what is relevant is the huge amount of child pornography made from sexually abusing a child and distributing it.

the idea of "So if I were to take a photo of you and your 7 year old sister, and then upload it for millions to splooge over" is fucking retarded and completely out of what the issue is.

there's a seedy subculture in the internet where people will sexually abuse children for the purposes of financial gain or simply a sick thrill. these kids are irrevocably harmed mentally and depending on the severity of the abuse they can also harmed physically.

this has nothing to do with taking pictures of fucking 7 year old kids. this is about people who abduct and abuse children sexually.

[JesterUK]

Drsalvador posted:

holy fucking shit you are despicable.

come on Drsalvador calm yourself

[Bawbag]

The Mighty Boat posted:

btw guys please take ur little slapfight to somewhere more private thanks

Blame thisispain, I just felt obliged to respond to his comments.

thisispain posted:

this has nothing to do with taking pictures of fucking 7 year old kids. this is about people who abduct and abuse children sexually.

How the flying fuck is that nothing to do with the sexual abuse of children?

[Akasori]

Legal Child Porn Linked to Lower Child Sex Abuses

What have they done! Hide your kids!

[The Mighty Boat]

Bawbag posted:

Blame thisispain, I just felt obliged to respond to his comments.

lol you have no idea how little i care just stop

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

If she had really been raped; I would think she wouldn't have been so public about it.

how do you even qualify this. should someone not go public with their rape?
you're just dragging yourself into a hole.

[Bawbag]

thisispain posted:

you're just dragging yourself into a hole.

Like those child molesters who took those pictures you're defending.

seriously, how can you defend the sexualisation of children? It's disgusting.

[The Baconator]

Zeke129 posted:

Enemy casualties:

How is a site that can arguably be worse than 4chan be so mainstream? I mean you see "share to reddit" buttons on tons of sites. For example on Steam

[Sickle]

It's dangerous to accidentally rate posts in this thread, holy fucking balls.

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

How the flying fuck is that nothing to do with the sexual abuse of children?

because pictures of small children aren't child pornography until there's explicit sexual content within the pictures.

[The Baconator]

For example on Steam

[Alice3173]

Elecbullet posted:

No but /b/ especially is so tremendous and fast-moving that threads can last for quite a while "b4 404".

Wouldn't a faster moving thread on 4chan lock more quickly? I thought they got automatically deeletd after a certain amount of time or a certain amount of posts.

[Elecbullet]

Bawbag posted:

Like those child molesters who took those pictures you're defending.

seriously, how can you defend the sexualisation of children? It's disgusting.

thisispain posted:

this isn't even relevant.
what is relevant is the huge amount of child pornography made from sexually abusing a child and distributing it.

the idea of "So if I were to take a photo of you and your 7 year old sister, and then upload it for millions to splooge over" is fucking retarded and completely out of what the issue is.

there's a seedy subculture in the internet where people will sexually abuse children for the purposes of financial gain or simply a sick thrill. these kids are irrevocably harmed mentally and depending on the severity of the abuse they can also harmed physically.

this has nothing to do with taking pictures of fucking 7 year old kids. this is about people who abduct and abuse children sexually.

defending

[Sickle]

snip

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

seriously, how can you defend the sexualisation of children?

i'm not even defending anything, i'm correcting your ridiculous arguments that don't make any sense.

[Bawbag]

thisispain posted:

because pictures of small children aren't child pornography until there's explicit sexual content within the pictures.

This isn't explicit sexual content. Now are you going to say that a picture of a child in a similar state isn't abuse?

[AngryChairR]

thisispain posted:

because pictures of small children aren't child pornography until there's explicit sexual content within the pictures.

That's not how it's defined.

[Elecbullet]

Onyx3173 posted:

Wouldn't a faster moving thread on 4chan lock more quickly? I thought they got automatically deeletd after a certain amount of time or a certain amount of posts.

uhhhh there is an image cap, you can post with or without an image and once 150 or so images are in a thread, you can only post text, so porn threads die pretty quick when that happens. However most threads don't get anywhere near the "image cap".

[thisispain]

Bawbag posted:

This isn't explicit sexual content.

yes it is because it's nudity intended to entice.