[FrEeKy ThInG]

yeah the predator aiming dots arent that good :C

[gtanoofa]

Cool lighting and atmosphere.

[Angry man]

:toot:
I like

[The Combine]

P cool

[ramblingoxen]

The random crimps below the neck kind of bug me, I like the predator dots though

[Sergeyev]

I don't like the watermark at the top, I don't see a point in it at all, this isn't like a big Hollywood effects, shoot 'em up pose, it's a Combine with 6 red dots on him from the Predator, so it's nothing glamorious or special.

[ttam6297]

Yeah, unless you spent a year on a single edit, I don't think any edit deserves a water mark.

[Chonch]

I just noticed how low-poly that Combine is.

Also those red dots should probably be lighter.

[OtterFromSpace]

ramblingoxen posted:

The random crimps below the neck kind of bug me, I like the predator dots though

dude that is an epic picture

on-topic I like the atmosphere and lighting is pretty cool
I do agree I dislike the dots

[Sergeyev]

I disagree on you're comment about the "epic picture". I see no "epicness" in this picture other than a generic standing Combine, background blurred, 6 Red dots and a watermark aswell as a border.

[FrEeKy ThInG]

Sergeyev posted:

I disagree on you're comment about the "epic picture". I see no "epicness" in this picture other than a generic standing Combine, background blurred, 6 Red dots and a watermark aswell as a border.

"I disagree on your comment"
you're is you are.
"I disagree on YOU ARE comment."
...

[Dirf]

gtanoofa posted:

Cool lighting and atmosphere.

Did you even look at the picture?

What lighting? There's no lighting edit as far as I can tell.
Why is the atmosphere good? There's nothing special about it. I don't get any atmospheric feel off this picture.

On the picture: It's a good start for editing, but it lacks content.

[gtanoofa]

Dirf posted:

Did you even look at the picture?

What lighting? There's no lighting edit as far as I can tell.
Why is the atmosphere good? There's nothing special about it. I don't get any atmospheric feel off this picture.

On the picture: It's a good start for editing, but it lacks content.

The lighting saying from me is shading. And the atmosphere, it does have as my edits don't have anything atmospheric. Just see the lighting on the combine, it doesn't remind source engine.

[Dirf]

gtanoofa posted:

The lighting saying from me is shading. And the atmosphere, it does have as my edits don't have anything atmospheric. Just see the lighting on the combine, it doesn't remind source engine.

Hard to understand, but just because your edits don't have any atmospheric qualities doesn't mean that other people's edits suddenly do. And that thing you said about the lighting didn't make any sense.