Misleading title, fyi.
![]()
Misleading title, fyi.
![]()
I WANT MY NAKED CHICKS >:(
The soft snow effect looks weird, but the posing is good.
What he said.
Could use moar faceposing and muzzleflashes
Go to the sexpose thread!
How does it look weird? :smug:
Not face poseable. No muzzle flashes with a silencer, specially in the winter.
Only smoke, with the density of the snow added as well.
I mean weird in a good way, it gives the models some sort of weird contour, like purple/red/something.
Sorry I cant find the words to express myself right now.
It looks cool.
Hot! .... wait not, let me try again.
Cold!
Oh that's chromatic aberration(sp?) that is red on the back of the left soldier. I think I used it too much here.
:smug:
Those two are ugly chicks. If I where drunk perhaps...
Nice posing.
wat.
where are the chicks, BRO?
It was a joke.
You could of atleast put a chicken in it or something.
Reversed dead cats are looking through the window i believe.
Quite nice. Picture needs some more contrast though and why does the fella on the left have a big red outline?
Must be a nude chicken of course.
OP did not deliver.
I always like your work.
I overdid the chromatic aberration, contrast? I did a screen of a gradient to make it look like it was a light day, while snowing. I don't think it needs more contrast then it already has.
If you're wondering where the "naked" girls are, they aren't here. If you believed for one second that I put a sex pose or nude person out of the sex pose central thread, then well, you expect wrong
But really, I wanted the title so it would attract more people, since normal thread titles just don't seem to do it anymore.
No we didn't believe you would pose nude chicks here:)
Is there something in that window, or is a trick of light?
The picture is very grey and flat. There are very few shadows and highlights that stand out, if any. I think upping the contrast or using a duplicated layer set to "overlay" might help rectify this.
?
Dammit, mod changed the title, lol.
vast amounts of chromatic aberration don't make your boring, poor composition screenshots any better
I think that looks a lot better.
Who rated this man dumb? He has a good point about chromatic aberration.
Too much chromatic abberations. Looks like the picture was actually taken with a 15Mpx EOS 50D and a very shitty lens.
no one can read, huh?
Being a jackass doesn't help either.
I cant tell the difference.... :|
Mind uploading them on that Comparison page(Dunno the name)?
I don't know the website's name.
i wouldn't have to be a jackass if you people would actually learn how to make things look good
you'd think with all the criticisms i give you'd get some free lessons out of them
Nevermind that dude Satan~ he is an obvious troll :P
EDIT:
http://comparescreenshots.slicx.com/
The page for comparing SS. (Ninja'd from Chestys thread lol)
what are you stupid?
he's obvious giving out good C&C.
since when is saying "your picture has too much chromatic aberration and you would learn to make your pictures better if you actually listened" trolling? here's a hint, kiddo: it's not.
C&C is made by giving an advice towards a problem or pointing a problem and giving the solution, not just saying "The blablablabla amounts of blablabla makes your picture horrible". Learn before you post.
So you HAVE to be a jackass if you don't like the pictures people are making? What argument is that?
any idiot can tell that if you have TOO MUCH chromatic aberration you clearly need to tone it down. what tips am i going to give for that? it's obvious: don't use the filter.
I'd rather use it and learn how to use it correctly then be told to not use it at all.
manual chromatic aberration? used correctly?
wow, that's a good joke
Oh, so you're the master of making a picture?
I'll take criticism when I don't sense a giant douche.
Quintessentially, yes. I'm probably more qualified and educated in the field of photo editing and manipulation than you and the majority of the rest of this board are; I'm a professional. I stopped bothering to be nice when I realized none of you actually listen unless it's drilled into your head. Why should I run around spending more time trying to sugar coat things when I can just type direct, blunt criticism so you can actually understand?
Because actually going out of your way to being a prick you can explain things, give ideas, not blunt and pathetic idea's like "You're no good, stop making this" No. You get no where in life like that, if you're professional then you wouldn't mind showing us your portfolio? Or even perhaps a glance at something? Of course you can tag it, I mean, since we're so bad we'd obviously try and steal it to claim it as our own.
People will listen when they don't get comments like "Your picture sucks, stop being so shitty."
where did i say "you're no good, stop making this"? here's a hint: i didn't.
the only things i've said about your picture in this thread have been:
• there's too much chromatic aberration
• it's boring
• it has poor composition
I'm not going to sit here and lecture you on the basics of composition and improving angles--look at other screenshots that are actually good if you can't figure it out. practice, watch movies and pay attention.
Why would I allow my personal life to overlap my internet life? That's just ridiculous to the highest degree.