Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #1Hi. thinking back about the good days when you did play 24 hours every day! So mutch fun... Now fore like 1 year rust have been shit.. Not even talk about the new shit they did make its like (SHOT ME)
Anyway! Why cant they make so we can play rust alpha like 14 months ago! Best time my life best game every made!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaoM7pQDNvw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOcgDC-xEB8
SAD :(
(User was banned for this post ("Crap thread/stealth YT advertisement" - SteveUK))
-
-
If a computer game was the best time in your life seek help!
-
True, exactly 1 year ago, I played this 24/7. The new version is still far from being close to legacy.
-
Play legacy?
-
You want the web version back?
-
apparently..
-
You dont get the point!
Edited:
It is like that every one that dont have play rust when it was in web version or eraly relese on steam. They dont know what they did miss! after they did place all the fucking rocks in rust it was going down! then after that ahhh fuck it....! we make a new game? en they spend so mutch time in it and its even more shit!
Thats what i am trying to say. Rust was so good before! Why did they not fix all the bugs and some new stuff thats all... They are thinking to fucking big and thats whats destry the good old rust! sad..
sry my very bad english
-
Hi Somut
you could get better English If you would use Google language translator ! just a thought.
-
Sure, play unprotected version of the game, where amount of cheaters is higher then amount of players.
If they was only able to handle the cheasters - only few players would be staying in new rust, rest would return to legacy. But devs can never handle cheats, and never will.
-
Even if legacy wasn't outdated and full of hackers, you guys would be playing it less than before. Thats how any honeymoon phase works. You play it like crazy then eventually you move on to something else. Trying to imply you don't because of the new version is your terrible excuse.
-
We not playing new version eather, because it's not a game yet, but a test level. And also because new mechanics are booring crap.
And yes, i would play legacy if only there were good protection from cheaters. Just because there is alternative right now, when h1z1 is not released yet.
-
Welcome to early-access.
-
You guys jst dont have any vision! The "new rust" holds so much more potential then your beloved legacy. It was never meant to be a simple pvp combat arena game like legacy became.
-
There are still some good servers up with active admins, and some of the better anti-cheat mods catch annoying cheats that hackers use to raid like superjump or wall hack. Aimbotting is near impossible to detect server side with mods, so you will have that, but if admins are vigilant, it's not hard for them to identify, especially those folks with profiles showing things like 1 game and 20 hours on rust.
Edited:
I don't get the feeling that most of the folks who miss legacy and complain about formerly-known-as-experimental are terribly worried about 'potential'. Legacy was fun and playable.
"It was never meant to be a simple pvp combat arena game like legacy became."
The PVP in legacy wasn't and isn't 'simple' or 'arena' like. Building, gathering, raiding, etc. all made it much deeper than something like CS:GO with looting.
-
I just dont see how legacy could have ever had the depth that this new version of rust promises. The communities that can be built and with the possible server migration thats the most exciting aspect i have seen. I think its more than likely that factions and companies will develope which will bring a whole new dynamic to the game. There will be a purpose to your actions way beyond simply avoiding hackers and ass holes. I am not saying there wont be a bit of both but i am confident that devs and players will devlope methods of dealing with both.
The thing i am noticing most in these threads is that people are comparing legacy during its hay day to exp as it sits now. The two are very different animals, the new version is still just an infant compare to the amount of content that legacy had. When the new version is at th t point it will blow legacy away, and then move so far beyond what legacy was or ever could have been.
-
No one is claiming that to be the case.
Edited:
You respond to people pining for Legacy in it's hay day who compare it to Rust right now, then say that the new Rust has a lot of potential, and then wonder why people compare Legacy to Rust as it is now. That is the point of the pining.
-
They can play legacy all they want! My problem wih them is that they want the new rust to BE LEGACY!
-
Well, I do. There's a fully functional weather system in Legacy, for example. But the server only sends RPC to the client to update just enough to let the client see the Moon phase cycle, and nothing more. Legacy's weather system fully supports fog, haze, smoke, dust, and offers properties to tune cloud size, density, raggedness, color, transparency, etc. etc. etc. and integrates with the other game components that interact with light sources, like shadows. I've coded server-side mod to control the weather system, and verified it works. But the server doesn't send that data to the client. Patching the client would be required to allow the server-side weather mods to be seen, even though the server and client posses fully-operational weather systems.
Now that I know it exists and what the client needs to see it, it'd take me a day or so to do that. But I have no idea if clients could run it without getting a VAC ban.
Another example: there is code to support brick and concrete building materials (concrete is stronger than metal, brick is in between wood and metal). But there is no artwork for those materials apart from what appears in the static buildings. It might be possible to re-use that artwork to enable the extra materials to be used in game, but again this would certainly required a client-side mod.
Dumb x 11
Agree x 1
Optimistic x 1
Funny x 1
Useful x 1
Winner x 1
Informative x 3