[SebiWarrior]

I made a thread! What an extraordinary event!

After fixing my overheating problem I decided to come back in style by making a picture with no logic whatsoever.
Here's a comparison, original from final (without the filter).

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/56602

[Ham_Wallet]

The guys that are in focus the most appear to be floating? Is that intended?

[SebiWarrior]

Ham_Wallet posted:

The guys that are in focus the most appear to be floating? Is that intended?

Nope, they just decided not to cast shadows, and lamps didn't work either. I guess the models aren't intended to. There's only so much I can do.

[Ham_Wallet]

It looks like they have cast shadows straight down. Shame because the posing is good and the editing is great. Just the floating feeling hurts it. Have a pallet anywho.

[SebiWarrior]

Ham_Wallet posted:

It looks like they have cast shadows straight down. Shame because the posing is good and the editing is great. Just the floating feeling hurts it. Have a pallet anywho.

I even tried modifying the shadow settings in the console but nope they just ignored all my efforts.

[Everest]

Yeah I seem to be having issues with ragdolls casting shadows recently too. Nothing can get them to cast a shadow, but everything else (guns, props, world) casts just fine.

Nice pic, shame about the shadows.

[wraithcat]

SebiWarrior posted:

I even tried modifying the shadow settings in the console but nope they just ignored all my efforts.

PRobably weren't compiled with mostlyopaque

[Joazzz]

wraithcat posted:

PRobably weren't compiled with mostlyopaque

that should be a capital offence

[KommunistBear]

I'm so damn confused at what's happening.
What the hell is the person in the foreground doing?!

[wraithcat]

Joazzz posted:

that should be a capital offence

Imho, that's the case for a lot of pre 2010 models. Dynamic shadows started being a big deal only about at 2009 and it was until 2010 or so that people figured out $mostlyopaque as a fix.