Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #321
Well, you should be able to play, I would hold off for a bit though since the mac version seems to be having some issues.
-
-
CPU: Intel I7-4770K w/ Noctua NH-D14 Fan
GPU: Gigabyte AMD 7970GHZ
Three HDD's running all on 7200RPM in order of size, bolded is harddrive with game: WDC 2TB Booter/WDC 2TB Gaming and Storage/Seaway 1TB Backup Storage
Memory: 16GB of DDR3 1600
Does it run?: Yes, but the server menus lack of a stop refresh button can crash the game.
-
Pretty sure this will run. Making sure though.
Thinking of getting Rust very soon.
Windows 7 Ultimate.
32 GB Ram
AMD FX-4170 Quad-Core 4.20 GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 TI
-
Most certainly will. Will run on high or maybe better, not sure.
-
You probably can play it on your mac, but don't expect wonders.
-
You need 19 Watercooled Titans to enable maximum rust mode.
-
I have two air-cooled ones, works just fine...
-
I'm p sure that was meant as a joke.
-
I know it was, some other poor saps might not though
-
Hello my friend has this laptop pc and he was wondering if he could run the game on the lowest of settings while maintaining a playble fps count. What do you think?
Windows 8 laptop 14" PC
Cpu: Intel(r) Celeron(R) SPU 877 @ 1.40GHz 1.40GHz
Gpu: Intel (R) HD Graphics
Ram: 4gb
HDD:500gb Standard HDD
-
No: Celeron is Intel's budget line of processors, not at all built for gaming. Also he barely meets the RAM requirements and Intel HD graphics are shit for gaming. Sorry, man.
-
Yea that's what I thought thanks mate.
-
I'm going to bump this back to the top for now just since it has become the official thread.
-
Im getting about 400 dollars from an insurance claim soon and I was wondering if that would be enough to buy something that would run this game. If so could anyone give some recommendations?
-
You should, but I doubt that will be able to max the game. Go AMD for processor, gigabyte mobo, mid range graphics card, at least 4 gigs of ram and a cheap hard drive.
-
appreciate it man. Im not too concerned about maxing it out I just really want to play.
-
Johnny, its a funny question asking if it will run.. but the real question here is.... WILL IT BLEND?
-
Windows 7 pro 64 / OS X 10.9.1
CPU : i5 2,4 GHz
RAM : 4 go 1067 MHz DDR3
GPU : GT 330M 256 Mo
-
Iffy... I doubt it is going to play above low settings, but you might want a second opinion on that one.
Edited:
No.
-
Windows 8.1 Pro 64bit
Intel quad q6600
4GB DDR2
Radeon HD 5870
-
Nvidia GT630
Intel core 2 DUO 2.4GHZ
3GB RAM
-
Hey,
the game runs quite good, but my GPU usage is at 100%. So after a minute the GPU gets over 75°C... Is such an high GPU usage normal?
Intel i7-3770K @ 3,5 GHZ
Sapphire R9 280X
8 GB RAM
Win 8.1 Pro 64 Bit
Thanks.
-
Yes, will play on medium-high or better is my estimate.
Edited:
You're pushing it. Probably low, but I am not sure, I don't know how well the GT cards perform.
-
30+ fps i guess never checked it but always smooth gameplay
-
Yes it is, Rust has an issue with not capping your frame rate. Force vertical sync and that should really cool your card.
Edited:
What was the point of this, just to show off? Yes, you will run it fine.
-
u also show your pc so i thought yay pc show rooms ... dont get mad :DDDD
-
I showed my laptops at the top. And I don't do shows because it's stupid. I may have good hardware, but honestly who watches through those videos
-
i do i like hardware setups even if it's network setups or anything else ... generally i like tech :DI showed my laptops at the top. And I don't do shows because it's stupid. I may have good hardware, but honestly who watches through those videos
-
My rig:
Windows 7 64-Bit
AMD Phenom II x4 965BE 3,4Ghz (OC'd to 4,0Ghz)
CPU(Cooler) Noctua NH-U12P Se2
Asus Geforce GTX 760 DirectCU II OC 2Gb GDDR5
Corsair XMS3 4x2Gb DDR3
Cooler Master 650W GX, ATX-power supply, 80Plus Bronze
MSI 785GM-E51
Hitachi 500Gb
Kingston SSDnow v300 120Gb
Result: Rust runs little bit over 100 fps with settings on fantastic and grass on.
-
I'd like to add that performance also depends severely on server load. If the server is plagued with big buildings (player made, which translates into a lot of assets used), median performance will drop.
If the server is cleaner, performance will be better (tested this myself).
I compared a heavily loaded community server before and after the wipe, the difference was of over 60 frames. Friends with different hardware confirmed it.
@Zhugaf - might i ask how many volts are you running on your cpu? I'm thinking of clocking mine as well.
-
You probably know this already, but I'll say it just in case: do NOT go overclocking unless you are absolutely CERTAIN you have adequate cooling.
-
I think that it is something like 1.336v. But i wouldn't recommend that you go and bash the same voltage, because things might get hot! Get a really good cooler for your cpu and go easy with the overclocking. Once you go too high there is no coming back!
-
Windows 8.1
ASUS Maximus VI Formula 1150 socket
Intel Core i7 Haswell Overclocked @ 4.3GHZ Water Cooled with Corsair H100i
32GB G.Skill RAM @ 2800 MHZ
Two Sapphire Radeon 7970s linked via CrossFireX
2 500GB Samsung SSD using RAID 0.
I run 3 27" 3D Monitors and a 42" 4K Monitor/TV above them. I keep a steady 80 fps during firefights, and around 120 fps when I'm alone. Grass is off because I find it annoying.
-
I have a similar system to this, but still manage to get a higher framerate. In fact, I am at an average of 70fps in action on max settings at 1280x720. 100-150fps in quiet surroundings.
The game is on an Seagate SATA6 HDD, OS (Win8) is on a 120GB Intel SSD. 16 GB Corsair RAM, GTX 650 ti (2GB).
i7 3770 CPU @3.4ghz, Corsaid ram. Motherboard is Asrock Z77 PRO4.
-
You aren't running three monitors like him though, the more monitors, the higher the resolution, the more the performance hit.
-
AMD, seriously? You will heat up your computer much faster. Nobody who really know much about the technical side of IT still use AMD. The graphics cards are good, if you are able to cool enough but their CPU's were pwned by Intel a long time ago. (as a note, try to find a good server which runs AMD). Also, nothing less than 8GB nowadays when it comes to RAM, but the type and speed is of higher importance.
-
How well can I run it?
I can run games like World of Tanks on low settings at 60+ FPS, and all source games on high and medium settings. Also, Primal Carnage I can run fine, at around 40+FPS.
Windows 7
8GB DDR3 RAM
AMD Quadcore A8-3820
AMD Radeon HD 6550HD
1 TB HDD
-
Look at my setup. I bought that cpu for 100 euros and i can play infinite, rust, borderlands 2 and all the latest on ultra with 60 or more fps. And by the way, with 400 dollars he can't really buy an intel machine. It might cost way more. It's really about quality-price ratio (Not that i know about intel's cpu prices but i would just assume that they cost a lot more)
-
You are an idiot. Want to know why? Because the guy has a BUDGET! He asked for a $400-ish desktop build. $200 or so gets you an Intel CPU, and woosh, there's half his budget. it has NOTHING to do with power, as long as he is not planning on epic performance, AMD is ALWAYS the better choice, and he will still get great performance with it anyway. Also, I'll have you know that AMD's Opteron CPUs are great for servers, I did some hosting with an 8-core Opteron for CS:S and we never had a single hiccup (except when the provider was having issues, that was unrelated though.) Oh and also, I said at LEAST 4GB of RAM, that means 4+. Admittedly I should have said minimum 4, recommended 8, but it still stands.
-
Yeah I know, I have some experience with OC. In fact, my cpu is clocked right now (it's a Phenom II 940, which is exactly the same chip as the 965, minus the factory OC and unlocked multiplier). It's running @~3.5Ghz (stock 3.0), stock voltage. I'm thinking of getting a new cooler, and upping the volts a bit to try and reach the 4 Ghz mark.
I usually ask people the voltage with these OCed chips so I can get a ballpark figure before I do it.
Thanks for the tips anyway!
edit: Also @ppehrson, listen to johnnymad, he actually knows what he's talking about, apparently you really don't. AMD is great for budget PCs, or, some specific applications which benefit from the increased module count of the FX chips.
Agree x 1
Funny x 3
Dumb x 1
Artistic x 1
Informative x 1
Disagree x 1