Not quite sure. First off, are you forcing your dedicated GPU on? You have to do that as rust doesnt do it automatically.
Not quite sure. First off, are you forcing your dedicated GPU on? You have to do that as rust doesnt do it automatically.
Windows 7 32 Bits
Intel(R) Dual Core(TM) Pentium 2.20 GHZ : Overclock 2.90 GHZ.
4 GB RAM
Nvidia Geforce 210 DDR3 1 GB 64 BITS
500GB HD
Directx 11
Thanks
It will play, but not very well at all, that's an extremely low-powered GPU and out of date at that.
here is my frames:
55-65 fps with grass.on true
70-80 fps with grass.on false
Windows 7 64bit
Intel(R) Xeon(R) E3-1230v3 @3.30
8 GB Ram
ASUS HD 7970 DirectCU II 3 GB GDDR5 384-bit
edit: 1080p and graphics on fantastic
Rodou a 20/27 Frames por segundos
Confing.cfg I'm using
Rust ON GEFORCE 210 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aifrha4FJs
I am From Brazilian :D
Yes, I do that for every game I install on my PC. Its with an Nvdia program, which makes me choose my desired card.
Post #967
Windows 7 home premium
8GB DDR3 RAM
Intel Z77 motherboard
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550ti 1GB
Intel I7 3770 quad core @3.4GHZ
1TB SATA3 WD black hard drive
Running at 1920x1080p fullscreen
Result: Ran fine with grass off at 50FPS when rendering large building but in the open it ran 60+FPS good for a PC that cost less the 1.5k to build.
Bumping the setting to mid drops the framerate down to 40 when rendering large buildings and in the open. Turning the grass back on drops the FPS even more we're now hovering at 30.
Cranking the setting's to the max and having the grass turned on drops the frame rate all the way down to 18-23FPS.
Overall i think my PC need's a upgrade.
ok thanks for the info but how many fps do you rather think?...
45-60
Ok so this game runs pretty badly for me,
I tried lowest setting and highest settings and the difference is about 5 fps....
My specs:
AMD phenom II 6 core @ 2.6 ghz
Nvidea GTX 760
10gb RAM (yes i know its an odd number im waiting for new stick to arrive and just stuck an extra 4gb cause why not?)
So realisticly i should be able to run this very well, buttttt...no
Oh well I hope this game gets optimised soon.
I get 50fps on a £350 pc
That's really weird, you should be just fine on those specs...
I have two builds to report.
Gaming PC:
AMD Phenom 2 Black Edition Quad Core 3.5GHZ
Nvidia GTX 660TI
8GB RAM
7200 RPM Hard drive.
Runs fine, I don't know exactly how many FPS but I have never seen it stutter, even with shadow play.
Everyday laptop (Lenovo Ideapad Y470):
Intel I3 ~2.0GHZ
Nvidia 550m 1GB
8GB RAM
7200 RPM Hard drive.
Runs file. I only did some light playing but it seemed to be good. Again, I'm not sure how many FPS, and I didn't get into any firefights with this laptop, but just for some light hunter gatherer stuff it was good, probably a solid 30 FPS.
http://pastebin.com/raPCQPne
Is this too shit to run rust?
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/2uP8q#incompatibilities
hey Guys investing my money in this is it able to run rust? I know a fair amount about computers and this is my first build. No worries over the incompatibility that is for an older version of my motherboard which is not made anymore.
It won't run too well, and because you are on Linux, it will be even worse as it is less optimized than PC.
Edited:
Yeah, you should be just fine with a setup like that, I ran a GTX 760 before I got my two titans, and it ran perfectly.
How do you guys measure your FPS's?
Windows 7 64-bit
Intel i5 670 - 3.4ghz duo core with hyper-threading
Radeon HD 6570 1GB
8GB RAM
1TB Hard Drive
Hi yes i really need some help figuring out this here are my specs
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 380 @ 2.53GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.5GHz
Graphics card: Intel(R) HD Graphics
RAM: 4GB
Please please help
This is why.
So that is why i would not be able to :(
Edited:
That means no or yes exactly?
No, unfortunately. Go invest about $500 into building a desktop, you will get much better results there
You need a good processor and a good ram. I run Rust with almost no graphics card, and it works fine. But yes, for good performance, you need a better graphics card.
You're processors bottlenecking, and on top of that bottlenecking your GTX760. time for a new cpu. the phenom 2 x6 were a dissapointment in performance when they were first launched, its basically like a phenom2 x4 @ 2.6ghz. great for simple games, but CPU intensive and newer games... not so good..
Edited:
download MSI afterburner, in the settings tab you can activate FPS display and "show fps in on-screen display" or sumthin similar. its not hard.
His CPU isn't bottlenecking, I used to run a GTX 760 alongside an (older) Athlon on socket FM2, and had no issues at all maxing it.
Sooooo... How does my rig hold up?
You should be fine running at medium, maybe high.
I have
I3 3220
8GB ram
1Tb hdd
and GT610
I only run @ 10 or less fps :(
i know my card is bad but 10 fps after the requirments steam listed i m disappointed since it said any card that supports directx 11(under the reccomended section)
The 610 is the least powerful card in the 600 series, iirc, you should know that having used it presumably for a while. That really won't run much of anything, I recommend you go out and buy a 660 or better, then you should be just fine.
true but i play other games i used to raid on wow at constant 15+ fps on never winter i don t drop under 45 fps and on skyrim i struggled to get 15-20 fps but, i didn t expect my fps to be so low on rust at least not after steam's recommended specs
I3 2,40 GHZ
310M 1GB
4GB
Win: 7
Don't count on it. Maybe 20 fps on absolute minimum
I just installed Rust on my PC. Pentium dual core 2.93 8GB ram Windows 7 with a Radeon 5450 512MB graphics card. Even with the graphics slider down to zero, the game is basically unplayable. Just wondering if upgrading to a Radeon 7730 2GB will cure my fps woes? Any comments would be appreciated.
It will help but i dont think you will be able to max it.
I'm not really worried about being able to max it. I'll be happy to be able to catch a pig to eat on low to mid settings. Right now it's so choppy that I literally can't catch anything to eat even with the video slider down to zero.
Well a more recent GPU should help, youshould be able to get to medium or high settings iwould think.
Amd a10-5750m laptop gpu 2.5 ghz with 3.5 ghz boost clock
8 gig ram 1600 mhz
How could i run rust at like 900p? maybe 768p?
Hi, how well could I run Rust on my laptop with these specs at medium settings?
OS - Windows 8.1 64bit
CPU - Intel i7 Quadcore 3632QM @ 2.20GHz - 3.1Ghz (Intel Turbo Boost)
Ram - 6GB
GPU - Nvidia GeForce GT 635m 2GB
Decent at best, maybe medium-high at native resolution.
Edited:
Medium-Low to Medium settings.
How many FPS do you suppose I could get?
60 or so on the aforementioned settings.