1. Post #961
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    What about this, also u got any tips what things could be better? (It is a notebook which I could chose between the parts I wanted in)

    Windows 7
    Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3610QM Quad Core Processor @ 2.30GHz (Auto turbo to 3.3GHz)
    12 GB RAM
    Intel(R) HD Graphics 4000 and Nvidia GTX670M - 1.5GB GDDR5
    120GB SSD
    750GB Serial ATA harddisk
    Directx 10
    The problem I have with most games is that I cant play on very high/ultra while this notebook(laptop) should be pretty strong for it.
    Got any idea what the problem is?

    Thanks
    Not quite sure. First off, are you forcing your dedicated GPU on? You have to do that as rust doesnt do it automatically.

  2. Post #962

    February 2014
    5 Posts
    Windows 7 32 Bits
    Intel(R) Dual Core(TM) Pentium 2.20 GHZ : Overclock 2.90 GHZ.
    4 GB RAM
    Nvidia Geforce 210 DDR3 1 GB 64 BITS
    500GB HD
    Directx 11

    Thanks

  3. Post #963
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Windows 7 32 Bits
    Intel(R) Dual Core(TM) Pentium 2.20 GHZ : Overclock 2.90 GHZ.
    4 GB RAM
    Nvidia Geforce 210 DDR3 1 GB 64 BITS
    500GB HD
    Directx 11

    Thanks
    It will play, but not very well at all, that's an extremely low-powered GPU and out of date at that.

  4. Post #964

    December 2013
    11 Posts
    here is my frames:
    55-65 fps with grass.on true
    70-80 fps with grass.on false

    Windows 7 64bit
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) E3-1230v3 @3.30
    8 GB Ram
    ASUS HD 7970 DirectCU II 3 GB GDDR5 384-bit

    edit: 1080p and graphics on fantastic

  5. Post #965

    February 2014
    5 Posts
    Rodou a 20/27 Frames por segundos
    Confing.cfg I'm using
    grass.on False
    grass.forceredraw False
    grass.displacement False
    grass.disp_trail_seconds 0
    grass.shadowcast False
    grass.shadowreceive False
    gfx.ssaa False
    gfx.bloom False
    gfx.grain False
    gfx.ssao False
    gfx.shafts False
    gfx.tonemap False
    input.mousespeed 5
    input.flipy False
    input.bind Left A None
    input.bind Right D None
    input.bind Up W None
    input.bind Down S None
    input.bind Jump Space None
    input.bind Duck LeftControl None
    input.bind Sprint LeftShift None
    input.bind Fire Mouse0 None
    input.bind AltFire Mouse1 None
    input.bind Reload R None
    input.bind Use E None
    input.bind Inventory Tab None
    input.bind Flashlight F None
    input.bind Laser G None
    input.bind Voice V None
    input.bind Chat Return T
    render.level 0.006478675
    render.vsync False
    render.af 0
    render.aa 0
    env.clouds False
    sound.music 0.2940379
    sound.volume 0.3147654
    footsteps.quality 0
    cursor.lock True
    cursor.recenter False
    cursor.uncenter False
    censor.nudity False
    terrain.idleinterval 0
    Rust ON GEFORCE 210 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aifrha4FJs
    I am From Brazilian :D

  6. Post #966

    February 2014
    2 Posts
    Not quite sure. First off, are you forcing your dedicated GPU on? You have to do that as rust doesnt do it automatically.
    Yes, I do that for every game I install on my PC. Its with an Nvdia program, which makes me choose my desired card.

  7. Post #967
    Idon'teven's Avatar
    February 2014
    7 Posts
    Windows 7 home premium
    8GB DDR3 RAM
    Intel Z77 motherboard
    Nvidia GeForce GTX 550ti 1GB
    Intel I7 3770 quad core @3.4GHZ
    1TB SATA3 WD black hard drive

    Running at 1920x1080p fullscreen


    Result: Ran fine with grass off at 50FPS when rendering large building but in the open it ran 60+FPS good for a PC that cost less the 1.5k to build.
    Bumping the setting to mid drops the framerate down to 40 when rendering large buildings and in the open. Turning the grass back on drops the FPS even more we're now hovering at 30.

    Cranking the setting's to the max and having the grass turned on drops the frame rate all the way down to 18-23FPS.

    Overall i think my PC need's a upgrade.

  8. Post #968

    January 2014
    6 Posts
    it should play on medium-low or so I would think
    ok thanks for the info but how many fps do you rather think?...

  9. Post #969
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    ok thanks for the info but how many fps do you rather think?...
    45-60

  10. Post #970

    February 2014
    1 Posts
    Ok so this game runs pretty badly for me,
    I tried lowest setting and highest settings and the difference is about 5 fps....
    My specs:
    AMD phenom II 6 core @ 2.6 ghz
    Nvidea GTX 760
    10gb RAM (yes i know its an odd number im waiting for new stick to arrive and just stuck an extra 4gb cause why not?)
    So realisticly i should be able to run this very well, buttttt...no
    Oh well I hope this game gets optimised soon.

  11. Post #971

    June 2013
    227 Posts
    Windows 7 home premium
    8GB DDR3 RAM
    Intel Z77 motherboard
    Nvidia GeForce GTX 550ti 1GB
    Intel I7 3770 quad core @3.4GHZ
    1TB SATA3 WD black hard drive

    Running at 1920x1080p fullscreen


    Result: Ran fine with grass off at 50FPS when rendering large building but in the open it ran 60+FPS good for a PC that cost less the 1.5k to build.
    Bumping the setting to mid drops the framerate down to 40 when rendering large buildings and in the open. Turning the grass back on drops the FPS even more we're now hovering at 30.

    Cranking the setting's to the max and having the grass turned on drops the frame rate all the way down to 18-23FPS.

    Overall i think my PC need's a upgrade.
    I get 50fps on a £350 pc

  12. Post #972
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Ok so this game runs pretty badly for me,
    I tried lowest setting and highest settings and the difference is about 5 fps....
    My specs:
    AMD phenom II 6 core @ 2.6 ghz
    Nvidea GTX 760
    10gb RAM (yes i know its an odd number im waiting for new stick to arrive and just stuck an extra 4gb cause why not?)
    So realisticly i should be able to run this very well, buttttt...no
    Oh well I hope this game gets optimised soon.
    That's really weird, you should be just fine on those specs...

  13. Post #973

    December 2013
    39 Posts
    I have two builds to report.

    Gaming PC:
    AMD Phenom 2 Black Edition Quad Core 3.5GHZ
    Nvidia GTX 660TI
    8GB RAM
    7200 RPM Hard drive.

    Runs fine, I don't know exactly how many FPS but I have never seen it stutter, even with shadow play.

    Everyday laptop (Lenovo Ideapad Y470):
    Intel I3 ~2.0GHZ
    Nvidia 550m 1GB
    8GB RAM
    7200 RPM Hard drive.

    Runs file. I only did some light playing but it seemed to be good. Again, I'm not sure how many FPS, and I didn't get into any firefights with this laptop, but just for some light hunter gatherer stuff it was good, probably a solid 30 FPS.

  14. Post #974

    May 2012
    197 Posts
    http://pastebin.com/raPCQPne

    Is this too shit to run rust?

  15. Post #975

    February 2014
    4 Posts
    http://pcpartpicker.com/p/2uP8q#incompatibilities

    hey Guys investing my money in this is it able to run rust? I know a fair amount about computers and this is my first build. No worries over the incompatibility that is for an older version of my motherboard which is not made anymore.

  16. Post #976
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    http://pastebin.com/raPCQPne

    Is this too shit to run rust?
    It won't run too well, and because you are on Linux, it will be even worse as it is less optimized than PC.

    Edited:

    http://pcpartpicker.com/p/2uP8q#incompatibilities

    hey Guys investing my money in this is it able to run rust? I know a fair amount about computers and this is my first build. No worries over the incompatibility that is for an older version of my motherboard which is not made anymore.
    Yeah, you should be just fine with a setup like that, I ran a GTX 760 before I got my two titans, and it ran perfectly.

  17. Post #977

    February 2014
    4 Posts
    How do you guys measure your FPS's?

    Windows 7 64-bit
    Intel i5 670 - 3.4ghz duo core with hyper-threading
    Radeon HD 6570 1GB
    8GB RAM
    1TB Hard Drive

  18. Post #978

    January 2014
    6 Posts
    Hi yes i really need some help figuring out this here are my specs

    Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 380 @ 2.53GHz (4 CPUs), ~2.5GHz
    Graphics card: Intel(R) HD Graphics
    RAM: 4GB


    Please please help

  19. Post #979
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Graphics card: Intel(R) HD Graphics
    This is why.

  20. Post #980

    January 2014
    6 Posts
    This is why.
    So that is why i would not be able to :(

    Edited:

    This is why.
    That means no or yes exactly?

  21. Post #981
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    So that is why i would not be able to :(

    Edited:



    That means no or yes exactly?
    No, unfortunately. Go invest about $500 into building a desktop, you will get much better results there

  22. Post #982
    masesm's Avatar
    July 2013
    118 Posts
    You need a good processor and a good ram. I run Rust with almost no graphics card, and it works fine. But yes, for good performance, you need a better graphics card.

  23. Post #983

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    Ok so this game runs pretty badly for me,
    I tried lowest setting and highest settings and the difference is about 5 fps....
    My specs:
    AMD phenom II 6 core @ 2.6 ghz
    Nvidea GTX 760
    10gb RAM (yes i know its an odd number im waiting for new stick to arrive and just stuck an extra 4gb cause why not?)
    So realisticly i should be able to run this very well, buttttt...no
    Oh well I hope this game gets optimised soon.
    You're processors bottlenecking, and on top of that bottlenecking your GTX760. time for a new cpu. the phenom 2 x6 were a dissapointment in performance when they were first launched, its basically like a phenom2 x4 @ 2.6ghz. great for simple games, but CPU intensive and newer games... not so good..

    Edited:

    How do you guys measure your FPS's?

    Windows 7 64-bit
    Intel i5 670 - 3.4ghz duo core with hyper-threading
    Radeon HD 6570 1GB
    8GB RAM
    1TB Hard Drive
    download MSI afterburner, in the settings tab you can activate FPS display and "show fps in on-screen display" or sumthin similar. its not hard.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Sweden Show Events Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  24. Post #984
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    You're processors bottlenecking, and on top of that bottlenecking your GTX760. time for a new cpu. the phenom 2 x6 were a dissapointment in performance when they were first launched, its basically like a phenom2 x4 @ 2.6ghz. great for simple games, but CPU intensive and newer games... not so good..

    Edited:



    download MSI afterburner, in the settings tab you can activate FPS display and "show fps in on-screen display" or sumthin similar. its not hard.
    His CPU isn't bottlenecking, I used to run a GTX 760 alongside an (older) Athlon on socket FM2, and had no issues at all maxing it.

  25. Post #985

    February 2014
    4 Posts
    Sooooo... How does my rig hold up?

  26. Post #986
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Sooooo... How does my rig hold up?
    You should be fine running at medium, maybe high.

  27. Post #987

    February 2014
    2 Posts
    I have
    I3 3220
    8GB ram
    1Tb hdd
    and GT610

    I only run @ 10 or less fps :(
    i know my card is bad but 10 fps after the requirments steam listed i m disappointed since it said any card that supports directx 11(under the reccomended section)

  28. Post #988
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    I have
    I3 3220
    8GB ram
    1Tb hdd
    and GT610

    I only run @ 10 or less fps :(
    i know my card is bad but 10 fps after the requirments steam listed i m disappointed since it said any card that supports directx 11(under the reccomended section)
    The 610 is the least powerful card in the 600 series, iirc, you should know that having used it presumably for a while. That really won't run much of anything, I recommend you go out and buy a 660 or better, then you should be just fine.

  29. Post #989

    February 2014
    2 Posts
    true but i play other games i used to raid on wow at constant 15+ fps on never winter i don t drop under 45 fps and on skyrim i struggled to get 15-20 fps but, i didn t expect my fps to be so low on rust at least not after steam's recommended specs

  30. Post #990

    January 2014
    10 Posts
    I3 2,40 GHZ
    310M 1GB
    4GB
    Win: 7
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows 7 Poland Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  31. Post #991
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    I3 2,40 GHZ
    310M 1GB
    4GB
    Win: 7
    Don't count on it. Maybe 20 fps on absolute minimum

  32. Post #992

    February 2014
    7 Posts
    I just installed Rust on my PC. Pentium dual core 2.93 8GB ram Windows 7 with a Radeon 5450 512MB graphics card. Even with the graphics slider down to zero, the game is basically unplayable. Just wondering if upgrading to a Radeon 7730 2GB will cure my fps woes? Any comments would be appreciated.

  33. Post #993
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    I just installed Rust on my PC. Pentium dual core 2.93 8GB ram Windows 7 with a Radeon 5450 512MB graphics card. Even with the graphics slider down to zero, the game is basically unplayable. Just wondering if upgrading to a Radeon 7730 2GB will cure my fps woes? Any comments would be appreciated.
    It will help but i dont think you will be able to max it.

  34. Post #994

    February 2014
    7 Posts
    I'm not really worried about being able to max it. I'll be happy to be able to catch a pig to eat on low to mid settings. Right now it's so choppy that I literally can't catch anything to eat even with the video slider down to zero.

  35. Post #995
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    I'm not really worried about being able to max it. I'll be happy to be able to catch a pig to eat on low to mid settings. Right now it's so choppy that I literally can't catch anything to eat even with the video slider down to zero.
    Well a more recent GPU should help, youshould be able to get to medium or high settings iwould think.

  36. Post #996

    January 2014
    14 Posts
    Amd a10-5750m laptop gpu 2.5 ghz with 3.5 ghz boost clock
    8 gig ram 1600 mhz
    How could i run rust at like 900p? maybe 768p?

  37. Post #997

    February 2014
    2 Posts
    Hi, how well could I run Rust on my laptop with these specs at medium settings?

    OS - Windows 8.1 64bit
    CPU - Intel i7 Quadcore 3632QM @ 2.20GHz - 3.1Ghz (Intel Turbo Boost)
    Ram - 6GB
    GPU - Nvidia GeForce GT 635m 2GB

  38. Post #998
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Amd a10-5750m laptop gpu 2.5 ghz with 3.5 ghz boost clock
    8 gig ram 1600 mhz
    How could i run rust at like 900p? maybe 768p?
    Decent at best, maybe medium-high at native resolution.

    Edited:

    Hi, how well could I run Rust on my laptop with these specs at medium settings?

    OS - Windows 8.1 64bit
    CPU - Intel i7 Quadcore 3632QM @ 2.20GHz - 3.1Ghz (Intel Turbo Boost)
    Ram - 6GB
    GPU - Nvidia GeForce GT 635m 2GB
    Medium-Low to Medium settings.

  39. Post #999

    February 2014
    2 Posts
    Decent at best, maybe medium-high at native resolution.

    Edited:



    Medium-Low to Medium settings.
    How many FPS do you suppose I could get?

  40. Post #1000
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    How many FPS do you suppose I could get?
    60 or so on the aforementioned settings.