Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #841
AMD Phenom II x4 945 processor 3.0ghz
windows 7 64 bit
8g Ram
Radeon HD 5450( I know really dated)
Can't get more than 12 fps with grass.on/displacement an shaders.on false and render on low...
-
-
I would get a newer card, that CPU should be good enough though.
-
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 cpu 3.00GHz
4GB RAM
64 Bit
Intel(R) HD Graphics
-
intel HD graphics are not good for any modern game realy.
you probably can get it running, but dont expect much higher than 20 fps with low settings.
-
Processor: Pentium(R) Dual-Core CPU E5200 @ 2.50GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.5GHz
Memory: 4096MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 4086MB RAM
DirectX Version: DirectX 11
Display Memory: 256 MB
Dedicated Memory: 0 MB
Shared Memory: 256 MB
Current Mode: 1680 x 1050 (32 bit) (59Hz)
The graphics card i'm putting in is a Sapphire Radeon HD770 1GB GDDR5
It requires a 450watt power supply. I am currently ordering a 500 watt power supply to use the graphics card. Will I be able to play Rust? If so, on what kind of graphics will I be able to play on and how many fps?
-
yes you can play pretty nicely with 7770, high/max with 60 fps probably if drivers are good and cpu wont bottleneck.
your CPU is quite outdated though, i suggest you to upgrade thatone as well as soon as possible
for budget gaming rig i would suggest you to go with something like: AMD FX 6300 ~$120, AM3+ motherboard (970 chipset, because its cheaper) ~$70, 8GB DDR3 ~$80, gtx650Ti or ati 260X ~$150 (better would be gtx 760 or ati 270+ thats ofc ~$250)
-
I was afraid you were going to say that... The whole thing has been cleaned out, and it did have 6.00 RAM before, but some people stole the other 2 memory... But anyway, are you positive it would run? What if I played on low or medium graphics?
-
Just a quick note for laptops. I have a MSI GS70 and it throttles when the power cable isn't plugged in.
i7-4700HQ
765m 2GB
16GB RAM
Hence why I get low-ish FPS without the cable plugged in. That's even with 'high performance' turned on in the power options
-
i7 4700
GTX 765m
8GB Corsair Vengeance
500GB SSHD + 8GB SSD
Just for u guys know, my laptop can run smoothly on highest settings using my dedicated GPU, sometimes it lags a little bit but it's game issues i must say, in the future it will be better optimized so i guess i'll run it even better. I'll download FRAPS to check my FPS and post here later.
-
well like i said your CPU might be the bottlneck.. allthough it shouldnt matter that much for this game.
with 7770 and your CPU im quite positive it will run, but not really sure how good.
-
Pentium G860
GTX 260 overclocked
1920x1080
Render quality set to minimum
Avg. fps 65, max. 110, min. 40. Depends on how many trees are near.
Grass off, of course.
-
Alright, well i guess i should wait and see. Thanks man.
-
I i would like to know if Radeon HD 6450 Asus and the Gigabyte HD 6450 1GB GDDR3 1100MHz would be ok for the graphics side?
Radeon HD 6450 Asus
Specifications
Graphics Engine - AMD Radeon HD 6450
Bus Standard - PCI Express 2.1
Video Memory - DDR3 1GB
Engine Clock - 625 MHz
Memory Clock - 1200 MHz ( 600 MHz DDR3 )
RAMDAC - 400 MHz
Memory Interface - 64-bit
Resolution
D-Sub Max Resolution : 2048x1536
DVI Max Resolution : 2560x1600
Interface
D-Sub Output : Yes x 1
DVI Output : Yes x 1 (DVI-D)
HDMI Output : Yes x 1
HDCP Support : Yes
ASUS Features - Silent Series
Power Consumption - up to 75Wno additional PCIe power required
Dimensions - 7 " x 5.43 " Inch
Gigabyte HD 6450 1GB GDDR3 1100MHz
GIGABYTE HD Experience Series
Powered by AMD Radeon HD 6450 GPU
Integrated with the first 1GB DDR3 memory and 64-bit memory interface
Features Dual-link DVI-D / D-sub / HDMI
GIGABYTE UD2 material
Support CrossFireX™ and Avivo™HD
System power supply requirement: 400W
Specification -
Chipset - Radeon HD 6450
DirectX - 11
OpenGL - 4.1
Core Clock - 625 MHz
Shader Clock - N/A
Memory Clock - 1100 MHz
Process Technology - 40 nm
Memory Size - 1 GB
Memory Bus - 64 bit
Card Bus - PCI-E 2.1
Memory Type - DDR3
Digital max resolution - 2560 x 1600
Analog max resolution - 2048 x 1536
Multi-view - 2
I/O - HDMIx1 DVI-Dx1 D-subx1
Card size - H=22 mm, L=183 mm, W=122 mm
Power requirement - 400 W
I have the game but i am trying to get my two mates on so i am upgrading their PCs. Are them 2 graphics ok for it?
-
Depends on the cash you have. That card is pretty weak to be honest and if they are "upgrading" the machine there's no point putting a super low spec card in.
Aim for a a bit higher if you have the cash a 7850 at least.
-
Thank you for the reply. "Upgrading" so the wrong word to use on my part. My one mate only ever play AoE 2 HD so he had no dedicated CC But all his other specs are ok to play rust. The other one don't really like pc's so i am building him one with my old parts. Their not really looking to spend alot. The 7850 in their eyes would be alot. What you think would be the GC range just 2 play it smooth?
-
That card you mentioned above should be alright, it will not max the game by any stretch though, best you could probably get out of that is medium or so I would think.
-
http://systemrequirementslab.com/cyri
Why not just use this?
-
Take a look at those extremely vague requirements and tell me why not...
-
According to them, almost any machine from the last 10 years will be fine.
Pretty optimistic, imo.
-
Well, my Pentium III laptop won't run it, and that thing is a little over ten years old
So yeah, I would call that way optimistic.
-
Windows 7
6GB RAM
Radeon R7 240 2GB DDR3
AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 220 Processor (2 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
919 GB SATA HDD
How many frames do you think I would run at max settings?
-
Heya,
will rust run and if so at what fps on max and lowest settings?
my gear is:
intel core i5 2450M 2.5 ghz
nvidia geforce 630m 2gb
8gb of ram, ddr3
if it's not going to run properly - can you tell me why?
-
You should hit a solid 60+ just fine.
Edited:
It will run, but probably only on medium or low, that GPU is kinda low for its generation and it is a mobile one.
-
Processor: AMD A6-5400K APU, 3.60GHZ
RAM: 6GB
GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7540D
Can I run it? I realize it's not the best PC in the world, but it holds up. I'd upgrade it if it weren't a freaking glorified laptop.
-
2.1GHz up to 2.6GHz AMD A6-4455M Accelerated Processor
4GB DDR3 SDRAM (1 DIMM)
AMD Radeon HD 7500G Discrete-Class graphics and up to 2033MB total graphics memory
Will it Run?
-
will run but not very good. if you crank up your ram speed then it should be a little better..but i'd say lowest settings around 20 fps, maybe slightly more.
pretty much same as above, but you have slighly weaker parts than the above poster
-
Can I get a second opinion?
-
Pretty much what he said, it's not going to run great, but it should run. You should pull through on low settings at about 30 fps or so.
-
I have a righteous rig (2.4 Ggz i7 quad core--2.5Ggbs of Video 750m GeForce--8Ggbs Ram-- 1TB)
I can Play DayZ Standalonee Very High @ 25-40 FPS depending where Im at.
I cann plaay Nether Very High @ 45-70FPS
I can play Rust 60FPS on the highest quality, but it has the freeze spikes that really piss me the heck off. Like Ill be running from a zombie horde, freeze for 3-6 seconds, and unfreeze and I have 4 health from being hit constantly. WTF is up? I cant even play lowest quality without random freeze spikes.
-
That's normal currently, just wait for better optimization.
-
Blegh. So it goes. I think I'll just save my dollars until I can afford to build a dedicated gaming PC.
-
Hey there. My girlfriend wants to play this game together with me.
This is her system:
Windows 7 64x
8GB Ram
Intel(R) HD Graphics 3000
Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2367M CPU @ 1.40GHz
Would she be able to run it?
-
No. I tested on a more powerful laptop with the same GPU and had no luck. Go be a good boyfriend and build her a gaming computer
-
Windows 7 64x
2.8GB RAM
Intel HD Graphics Pentium P6100
Intel Pentium P6100 @ 2.0 GHz
Lowest with no grass will do. Just hoping this potato can boot it up like it does for other Unity games. Looks a tad too low for this one. If you can an fps estimate would be great. Cheers :)
-
I tested on this system
Laptop:
Ram: 4GB
CPU: 2.3Ghz Dual Core
GPU: 256MB Dedicated Ram
Couldn't run it. It couldn't bypass loading screen xD
-
Guess that doesn't bode well for my system xD Oh well, might be able to pool together a little cash for a decent rig. A proper desktop this time so I don't run into the legendary no-upgrading problem laptops have haha :)
-
Not to counter attack alll you "Laptops suck" Mine was 986$, Lenovo Y500 and its plays ALLL of my games on ultra, with fraps, and tons of multitasking before you even notice any sort of lag created by PC problems. I could have built one with ultimate features yeah, but this one for its proce for the mobility? Hell yeah!
-
Alienware M15X
Intel Core I7 1.60Ghz
6 GB RAM
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M 4GB VRAM
Why run at about... 25 Fps, min settings even with the Grass off ?
-
Should be able to, might run medium as well.
-
NVIDIA GTX 645 - 2GB dedicated VRAM (4GB total)
Intel i7 4770 3.4 ghz (up to 3.9ghz)
16GB RAM
ASUS Monitor
I've got an issue. I can get a good framerate even at Good settings (around 40-50 FPS when looking out over a field), but my FPS sometimes chugs tremendously whenever I enter a radtown or hit an enemy up close with a shotgun. A close-range shotgun blast on a zombie can literally cut my FPS in half, and in radtowns, my FPS usually drops to around 25-30. This is weird, because reading this thread, I've seen people say that they could run the game just fine on Beautiful+ settings with GTX 650s, and since the GTX 645 is a slightly slimmed down version of the 650 (both GPUs are roughly equal according to online card comparison tests, though the GTX 645 possesses more efficient cooling), I'm not sure why I can't seem to get great FPS, even with the grass off. Only on "Fastest" and with the grass off can I run with absolutely no slowdowns at around 60-70 FPS throughout. I haven't tested it again yet, but I also uninstalled GeForce Experience, which I heard from several people can cause performance issues when active. I also tried setting my minimum CPU state to 100%, but Rust is apparently very, very non-CPU intensive; at 100% speed, Rust only utilized 2% of my processor power, and at a minimum of 5% speed, Rust only used about 10%. It's strange that I can run games like Skyrim on Ultra at 60 FPS or Planetside 2 on High at 35-50 FPS, but on the higher settings Rust can't even manage more than 30 FPS at times. I'm aware the game isn't optimized yet, but still.
Should I try playing on a lower resolution than 1920x1080 (I've heard that dramatically improves FPS on some NVIDIA cards)? Should I try messing around with NVIDIA Control Panel?
Disagree x 1
