Register
Events
Popular
More
Post #801
it will on lowest..probably around 20-30 fps maybe even more with lower resolutions.
your 2GB ram might be a little problematic though.
make sure you dont run backround programs that take a lot away
because swaping will make all slower
-
-
Not for me, no...
-
Hey, I'm thinking of buying rust but my PC's not great. I honestly don't care if I can only play it on the lowest possible settings with grass.on false.
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
Processor: AMD Phenom II P960 Quad-Core 1.8GHz
RAM: 4GB DDR3
Graphics: AMD M880G with ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Will this cut it?
-
Will this run the game?
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
Processor: AMD athlon IIP340 dual core processor 2.2 GHz
RAM: 4GB
Graphics: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
-
what a kind
thank you very much for your advice
i think i'll upgrade more ram
-
I'm gonna say no, that's an entry level card from the 4000 series, if it does play, it's going to be on low or medium-low.
Edited:
You will do about the same as the guy above.
-
Processor: 4th Gen Intel® Core™ i7-4770 processor (8M Cache, up to 3.9 GHz)
(Quad Core)
GFX Card: NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 645 1.0GB GDDR5
Hard drive: 1TB
OS: Windows 8.1
Memory: 12GB
Will it run it on High or something
Cheers.
-
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Processor: AMD FX-6300 @ 4.2 GHz
Hard drive: Samsung 840 Series Solid-State Drive
RAM: 8GB G.Skill Sniper series @ 1800 MHz
GPU(s): Crossfired Asus Radeon HD 7770 2GB Ghz-Edition
Resolution: 1440x900
Graphics Preset: Fantastic
Grass: On or Off, doesn't affect my performance
FPS: 65-80 FPS
-
Can i play rust on these specs?
Model:Aspire 5741g Windows 7 home premium
Processor: Intel core i5 , CPU M430 @2.26 2.27
Installed memory (ram) : 4.00
System type : 64 bit
-
How many fps would this get?
CPU: FX-8350 @ 4.55GHz
RAM: 8GB DDR3 1600MHz
GPU: AMD 7970
-
you can run but no hight framerate.. lowest settings and resolution maybe somewhat over 20 fps..
you should be able to run maxed with 60+ fps
-
Hey mate would appreciate it if you could check my Specs and give me your input, cheers.
(Posts above yours)
-
you should run fine on medium/high..over 30 fps
make sure your nvidia GPU is forced for the game.
games dont run good with intel IGP's
-
Thanks, know how i do that? (ie; right click)
-
OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual 3800+ 2.0Ghz
Hard drive: 160 Gb Maxtor Stm3160211as
RAM: 2GB DDr2 667Mhz Kingston
GPU: ATi Radeon X1650 Pro 256MB
Resolution: 1024x768
Graphics Preset: Fastest
Grass: Off
FPS: 20-30 FPS
Details: There is an error in which the texture of the sky is completely purple independent of the time in the game.
"It's time to retire this grandfather"
-
Windows Version: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600)
Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2220 @ 2.40GHz
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon Graphics Processor (0x95C5)
Total RAM: 2.0 GB
Can i run it ? and if yes how much fps?
-
You'll be fine maxing it, or if not it will play on high.
Edited:
HAHA! Damn! How much you want for that old piece of tech? I might have to buy it off you and add it to my laptop collection.
Edited:
I don't think so, that's a really low amount of RAM, and I am unsure about that GPU.
-
Thanks for the reply bud.
-
Windows 8.1 OS
Processor: AMD A4-5000 APU with Radeon HD Graphics
1.50 Ghz
Memory: 4GB
64-Bit operating system, x64 Based Processor
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon HD 8330
2048 MB of Graphic Memory
500 GB of Hard Drive space
Am I able to run Rust currently? I know I can run many of the newer games on full settings, but Rust seems a lot more needy in comparison to Saints Row IV.
Also, thank you to the people donating their time to helping others with the Rust requirements!
-
I don't think it will run at all, to be honest. First off, that's an entry level APU from AMD, and not a very good one, at that, plus it's mobile, lots less power than its desktop counterpart. Next, your memory: if you are running an integrated APU, that means that you are leeching from your system memory, IIRC. In other words, half of that memory is going to your integrated GPU and the rest is going to everything else, so basically you really only have 2 GB of RAM, nowhere near enough for Rust. Also that GPU is underpowered especially since it is integrated to your CPU. If you even do manage to get it running, I doubt it will be above the absolute lowest settings.
-
He does have a radeon hd8330 with 2 gb if you havent noticed. I think he should be ablw to play it perfectly finw.
-
no not even close to perfect, if even runs
it has similar performance as intel HD 4000
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Rad...0.92874.0.html
-
You didn't even read my post, did you? That's an INTEGRATED, ENTRY LEVEL GPU. And that 2GB is shared with his system RAM, so he is really only running 2 GB of RAM. There is no way he is playing on those specs.
-
Oh I'm sorry I didn't know it shared memory with his RAM
-
That's how it works on a mobile APU: It's a hybrid CPU and GPU on one chip (iirc, the GPU is 40% of the APU's composition.) That being said, memory is never integrated on the chip like it is on a graphics card, it is shared with system memory. If it were a dedicated GPU however, it would run on its own memory. That's my understanding of how it works, at least.Oh I'm sorry I didn't know it shared memory with his RAM
-
[QUOTE][My second test (My laptop)
Windows 8
8GB RAM
AMD Radeon HD 8550G 1GB RAM
AMD A8-5550 CPU @2.1 GHz
750 GB SATA HDD
Result: Did not play very well, around 20 FPS and jittered a whole lot. Lowest settings did not improve performance.
/QUOTE]
I have this same exact laptop. What I did was lowered my render quality and it ran almost perfectly.
-
mine:
win7 home premium
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 2500k @ 3.30
8 GB RAM
ASUS (Nvidia) GeForce GTX 660 Ti
200GB SSD, 500GB SATA, 1,5TB SATA
internet connection:
120 Mbps download
6 Mbps upload
Result: runs smooth on high settings with grass, no lags unless it's serverside
FPS: max: 56, min: 40
for ppl having issues with Nvidia cards:
with the latest cards(not sure about old ones) you can try optimizing with geforce exprience. let the GPU decide what vsync AA and other things should be
-
I couldn't get it to work, and I played around with a lot of settings and different resolutions, it just would not play nice with Rust. Then again, I haven't tested it ever since, maybe in a recent update it has become slightly more optimized, I will have to retest!
-
Windows 7
8 GB of DDR3
Some kind of AMD processor(Complete specs when I am home)
Radeon HD 5450(I know, not great)
I can't get more than 12-15 fps on the lowest settings with the grass turned off. Will take suggestions
-
If that is an integrated GPU (e.g. your processor is an APU,) then you can't expect very good performance. If not, I am not sure what it would be, since that card (assuming, again, it is a card,) is good enough to play the game
-
I know my computer should be able to run this game easily. For some reason it quits to the desktop right after the first splash screen (with the xx smilie face) comes up. Game won't run at all, but my Alienware can run any other 3d shooter out there....?
-
This is what http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/ gives me, says I pass the minimum but not recommended, would it be decent frames? around 30?
CPU
Minimum: Info
You Have: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2430M CPU @ 2.40GHz
CPU Speed
Minimum: 2 GHz
You Have: 2.4 GHz Performance Rated at: 6 GHz
RAM
Minimum: 4 GB
You Have: 6.1 GB
OS
Minimum: Windows XP
You Have: Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Edition Service Pack 1 (build 7601), 64-bit
Windows
Video Card
Minimum: Graphics card with DirectX 9 level (shader model 2.0) capabilities. Any card made since 2004 should work
You Have: GeForce GT 540M
Video Card
Features: Minimum attributes of your Video Card
Required You Have
Icon Pixel Shader version 2.0 5.0
Icon Vertex Shader version 2.0 5.0
Sound Card
Sound Card
Minimum: Yes
You Have: Realtek High Definition Audio
Sound Card Click here for the latest Sound Card drivers.
Free Disk Space
Free Disk Space
Minimum: 1 GB
You Have: 194.3 GB
Free Disk Space Click here for the latest Free Disk Space drivers.
-
Post specs anyway, desktop or laptop?
Edited:
Medium at 60 or so, that's a mobile GPU and not the best, but it should be enough to play decently.
-
-
I can't answer that, it is very dependent on what you want out of it. The game is still being actively developed and it is VERY buggy at times, and there is a lot of exploitation, and though I haven't come across many hackers in my time, they are rather wide-spread. If that doesn't entice you, I say hold off for a couple months and then get it, but yes, it WILL be worth it, I can guarantee that.
-
Would I be able to run Rust? At all?
CPU: Intel i7 4700MQ 2.4GHz (4 cores hyper threaded)
RAM: 8GB DDR3
Graphics: Intel Graphics 4600
-
Iffy, that integrated GPU is not a very good one, but it just might handle it alright, I say medium should be fine, but I would ask for a second opinion, I have only tested with IHDG 3000.
-
I can run most things on decent settings (a billion times better than my desktop's ATI Radeon HD 5450) but there's no real way I can test Rust without blowing $20. Thanks for the insight, medium would be fine by me. I'll keep checking the thread and see if anyone else has an opinion!
-
Hi there, will my PC do it ?
Windows Version: Microsoft Windows Vista Home Basic Edition Service Pack 2 (build 6002), 64-bit
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz
Graphics Card: ATI Radeon HD 4850
Total RAM: 4.0 GB
Thx
-
should play on medium to medium-high I think.
Agree x 1
Funny x 1
Dumb x 1
