1. Post #521
    Lassikki's Avatar
    January 2014
    1 Posts
    Windows 7
    8GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce 660
    Intel Core I3-2120 CPU 3.30GHz
    1TB SATA HDD (I think, not sure)
    24' HDTVMonitor Samsung

    Results: With full settings 60FPS (or even more). Runs smoothly and no problems.

  2. Post #522

    January 2014
    2 Posts
    Windows 7
    8GB RAM
    AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series
    Intel Core i3 2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz
    Direct X 11

    Would really appreciate some input on how well my system would run Rust, thanks.

  3. Post #523
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    Windows 7
    8GB RAM
    AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series
    Intel Core i3 2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz
    Direct X 11

    Would really appreciate some input on how well my system would run Rust, thanks.
    probably medium/high with 30+ fps

  4. Post #524

    December 2013
    56 Posts
    my system:

    i7 4770k @ 4,2ghz
    16gb 2133 ram
    nvidia gtx 780ti OC edition
    asus maximus VI Hero
    win 8.1
    direct x 11

    running at 1920x1080 fantastic
    most time 150 fps. when night comes i got over 200 fps. lowest fps are about ~120

  5. Post #525

    October 2013
    22 Posts
    Desktop (didn't build it myself):
    I5-3450@3,1 GHz 3,5 turbo (only uses about 25%)
    6GB ddr3 (4+2@1333) and 1,5TB seagate barracuda green 5900rpm
    NVidia GT545-3GB DDR3 FPS: around 35 on 1680*1050p.
    laptop nov '10: I3-370m@2,4GHz (uses 40-60%)
    3GB (2+1@1066) and 120GB kingston SSDnow V300 on sataI(150) :(
    ATI HD5470M-512MB DDR3 FPS: 25-30 on 800*480
    FPS on full-window ~720*1366(for opening third row in a crate): ~13

  6. Post #526
    Dennab
    December 2013
    69 Posts
    Intel i7
    Biostar
    16gb
    GeForce gtx 660ti
    90-100 fps
    Fully maxed
    While running 4 games but Im busy so didn't want too turn them off.

  7. Post #527

    January 2014
    73 Posts
    Windows 7
    Core 2 Duo e6550
    4 GB Ram
    ATI Radeon 4850 512 MB
    1024x768 19" screen (second system, for nephews to come and play during weekends, ran Minecraft well)

    If not playable, what is the best single PEG Connector VGA Card for me to get assuming the 4850 won't cut the deal.
    I have a corsair hx750W but just a single PEG Connector since I lost the detachable cables.

    Thank you

  8. Post #528
    ErikZ's Avatar
    July 2013
    38 Posts
    Windows 7 Professional
    Core i7-4770R
    32 GB RAM
    2x GeForce GTX 690
    ASUS PQ321 4K 31.5 inch Monitor

    Will it run rust?

  9. Post #529
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Windows 7 Professional
    Core i7-4770R
    32 GB RAM
    2x GeForce GTX 690
    ASUS PQ321 4K 31.5 inch Monitor

    Will it run rust?
    Yeah, you'll be fine and playing it at max.

  10. Post #530
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    Windows 7
    Core 2 Duo e6550
    4 GB Ram
    ATI Radeon 4850 512 MB
    1024x768 19" screen (second system, for nephews to come and play during weekends, ran Minecraft well)

    If not playable, what is the best single PEG Connector VGA Card for me to get assuming the 4850 won't cut the deal.
    I have a corsair hx750W but just a single PEG Connector since I lost the detachable cables.

    Thank you
    that card should cut it fairly good.. though driver support might be the problem since amd only supports from 5xxx up now.

    the cpu is quite old though.. but shouldnt be a huge deal for this game

  11. Post #531

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    Some suggestions with this system?
    Win 7 64-bit
    i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz
    Nvidia Geforce GTX 275
    6 GB RAM
    Samsung SyncMaster S22B150

  12. Post #532
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Some suggestions with this system?
    Win 7 64-bit
    i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz
    Nvidia Geforce GTX 275
    6 GB RAM
    Samsung SyncMaster S22B150
    New graphics card. Your CPU should be alright, but I would recommend an upgrade a generation or two there as well.

  13. Post #533

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    New graphics card. Your CPU should be alright, but I would recommend an upgrade a generation or two there as well.
    Thanks ;)

  14. Post #534

    December 2013
    5 Posts
    just wanted to add.. i Clocked my radeon 4530 but just wery little so i came up in 25-30 fps

    it works but it`s not recommended unless you know what youre doing

  15. Post #535
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    Some suggestions with this system?
    Win 7 64-bit
    i7 920 @ 2.67 GHz
    Nvidia Geforce GTX 275
    6 GB RAM
    Samsung SyncMaster S22B150
    i think GTX 275 should run it fairly good at med/high.
    it might be old but its not lowend card

  16. Post #536
    Excite's Avatar
    January 2014
    9 Posts
    Windows 7
    8GB RAM
    AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series
    Intel Core i3 2100 CPU @ 3.10GHz
    Direct X 11

    Would really appreciate some input on how well my system would run Rust, thanks.
    Not sure on the GPU due to it not showing the full GPU name(could be 7730,7750,7770,7790). The GPU itself will be good, as I use a 7730. Your CPU could use a bit of an upgrade, I'd go look at some quad core i5 processors, you can pick them up for as little as $180.
    Otherwise if you don't want to upgrade try medium settings.

  17. Post #537
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    i think GTX 275 should run it fairly good at med/high.
    it might be old but its not lowend card
    No, more likely medium at best. Despite being a mostly high-end card in its time, it's been a good, what, four years if I remember correctly, since the 200 series was on top?

  18. Post #538
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    No, more likely medium at best. Despite being a mostly high-end card in its time, it's been a good, what, four years if I remember correctly, since the 200 series was on top?
    true but shouldnt be a problem if 9800GTX can run this game on medium. and 9800GTX was rebranded to GTS260 if i remember correct... but 275 is more powerful. so i think it will run fairly good even on high settings.

  19. Post #539

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    true but shouldnt be a problem if 9800GTX can run this game on medium. and 9800GTX was rebranded to GTS260 if i remember correct... but 275 is more powerful. so i think it will run fairly good even on high settings.
    On High settings it goes slow and seems a little blocked. I have to find the right resolution.

  20. Post #540
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    true but shouldnt be a problem if 9800GTX can run this game on medium. and 9800GTX was rebranded to GTS260 if i remember correct... but 275 is more powerful. so i think it will run fairly good even on high settings.
    Alright then, I don't know much about that transition period in card generations, to be honest.

  21. Post #541

    January 2014
    73 Posts
    that card should cut it fairly good.. though driver support might be the problem since amd only supports from 5xxx up now.

    the cpu is quite old though.. but shouldnt be a huge deal for this game
    If it won't handle it, I might buy myself a HD 7770 vga card.
    Thanks mate, cheerio!

  22. Post #542

    December 2013
    7 Posts
    I will buy a new VIDEO CARD. actually i play with 13fps in 640x480, in 1024x768 i get 5fps, and i like play in 1024x768 at least with 60 fps.

    ACTUALLY MI SPECS:

    Intel 2 Core Quad Q83000 2.50 GHz (4 Cores)
    4GB RAM but i have other 4gb ram (8gb ram)
    ATI Radeon HD 3400 Series 512MB
    Windows XP (i will install windows 7 64-bit)

    specifically:

    CPU:



    MAINBOARD:



    that video card would be compatible with my pc

    BUDGET: $230

    I'm chilean, sorry for my bad english.

  23. Post #543

    January 2014
    1 Posts
    Looking for some assistance. I purchased Rust, and now can't play it. I thought my system met the requirements. It loads the game, but then once I click a server, it blinks red and it never loads. Any advice?

    AMD Athlon II X2 250 Processor 3ghz,
    8Gigs RAM
    64 bit Operating Sys.
    ATI Radeon HD 4250

  24. Post #544
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    I will buy a new VIDEO CARD. actually i play with 13fps in 640x480, in 1024x768 i get 5fps, and i like play in 1024x768 at least with 60 fps.

    ACTUALLY MI SPECS:

    Intel 2 Core Quad Q83000 2.50 GHz (4 Cores)
    4GB RAM but i have other 4gb ram (8gb ram)
    ATI Radeon HD 3400 Series 512MB
    Windows XP (i will install windows 7 64-bit)

    specifically:

    CPU:



    MAINBOARD:



    that video card would be compatible with my pc

    BUDGET: $230

    I'm chilean, sorry for my bad english.
    Yeah, definitely upgrade your graphics card, that is a lower-end card even for the time it was released. Get a mid-range 5000 or 6000 card, or go mid-500 or so from Nvidia.

  25. Post #545
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    Looking for some assistance. I purchased Rust, and now can't play it. I thought my system met the requirements. It loads the game, but then once I click a server, it blinks red and it never loads. Any advice?

    AMD Athlon II X2 250 Processor 3ghz,
    8Gigs RAM
    64 bit Operating Sys.
    ATI Radeon HD 4250
    you GPU is pretty old and low
    "blinking red" is probably due outdated drivers (which arent updated anymore on regular basis for 4xxx and below series from amd) or some overheating problems.

    anyway your card wouldnt run it with acceptable framerates anyway.
    get something midrange from amd or nvidia newer generations
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Linux Estonia Show Events Agree Agree x 1 (list)

  26. Post #546
    Gold Member
    hazzoki's Avatar
    June 2013
    112 Posts
    Suggestions for this system?

    Windows 7
    Gigabyte 990XA-UD3
    6 gigs of random RAM
    AMD FX 4170 @ 4.2Ghz
    Gigabyte GT640 OC

  27. Post #547
    Xpander's Avatar
    October 2013
    186 Posts
    Suggestions for this system?

    Windows 7
    Gigabyte 990XA-UD3
    6 gigs of random RAM
    AMD FX 4170 @ 4.2Ghz
    Gigabyte GT640 OC
    video card is pretty low, but probably can pull it off on low/medium settings

    get something from midrange and you are set.. 660+ or 760+

  28. Post #548
    Gold Member
    hazzoki's Avatar
    June 2013
    112 Posts
    video card is pretty low, but probably can pull it off on low/medium settings

    get something from midrange and you are set.. 660+ or 760+
    Yeah, i've been planning on getting a 760 at some point.. it does run it at max settings, with 40 fps tho, wich still amazes me

  29. Post #549

    December 2013
    86 Posts
    Windows 8.1
    Intel i3-2130 @3.40 GHz
    6GB of RAM
    GTX 650 Ti

    I get 60+ FPS on Fantastic settings. Sometimes drop below 60.

  30. Post #550

    January 2014
    9 Posts
    i think GTX 275 should run it fairly good at med/high.
    it might be old but its not lowend card
    GTX 275 is a crap videocard, he might run the game at the lowest settings if he is Lucky.
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Norway Show Events Disagree Disagree x 1 (list)

  31. Post #551

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 215 Processor / 2.7 GHz Performance Rated at: 5.27 GHz
    2.1 GB of RAM
    GTX GeForce GT 520

    Will it be a problem since i have 2 gb or i can buy it and play the game? :) thanks
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Windows XP Macedonia Show Events Optimistic Optimistic x 1 (list)

  32. Post #552
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 215 Processor / 2.7 GHz Performance Rated at: 5.27 GHz
    2.1 GB of RAM
    GTX GeForce GT 520

    Will it be a problem since i have 2 gb or i can buy it and play the game? :) thanks
    No, it will not play. Your RAM is far too low and that card is entry-level.

  33. Post #553
    Excite's Avatar
    January 2014
    9 Posts
    AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 215 Processor / 2.7 GHz Performance Rated at: 5.27 GHz
    2.1 GB of RAM
    GTX GeForce GT 520

    Will it be a problem since i have 2 gb or i can buy it and play the game? :) thanks
    GPU & CPU are outdated, I'd really look into a $450-500 computer if I were you. You might be able to run it at low.

  34. Post #554

    January 2014
    9 Posts
    I have:
    Windows 8.1
    Geforce GTX 780Ti 3GB
    Intel Core i7-4820K 3.7GHz (I got 3.8GHz total though somehow)
    16GB DDR3 (8x2)
    240GB SSD
    3TB regular saving Space

    I don't own Rust yet, but I think I would run it fine at max setting with 150fps.

    oh and my motherboard can run 256 GB ram I thought that was pretty special lol
    Reply With Quote Edit / Delete Reply Norway Show Events Funny Funny x 1 (list)

  35. Post #555

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    GPU & CPU are outdated, I'd really look into a $450-500 computer if I were you. You might be able to run it at low.
    When i got dayz with ARMA, i played it with low settings and it worked i do have fifa 14 & csgo also and they aren't the best like you said but they're good enough for me~_~ but i still think i can run it at low settings

  36. Post #556

    January 2014
    9 Posts
    GPU & CPU are outdated, I'd really look into a $450-500 computer if I were you. You might be able to run it at low.
    Oh wow 500 dollars? In Norway our taxes are maxed out, you would have to pay 1000$ to get a computer with like 6GB ram..

    Edited:

    When i got dayz with ARMA, i played it with low settings and it worked i do have fifa 14 & csgo also and they aren't the best like you said but they're good enough for me~_~ but i still think i can run it at low settings
    You're kind of supposed to run CS at low settings though to get a view-advantage :P can't see shit when all those details are everywhere

  37. Post #557

    January 2014
    5 Posts
    Oh wow 500 dollars? In Norway our taxes are maxed out, you would have to pay 1000$ to get a computer with like 6GB ram..

    Edited:



    You're kind of supposed to run CS at low settings though to get a view-advantage :P can't see shit when all those details are everywhere
    Well i guess, but still i am able to run some good games on my bad computer and now at the moment i am unable to upgrade anything, so thats why i was asking if i can run it at low settings and still play the game or just dont bother to buy the game anyways!

  38. Post #558
    Gold Member
    General J's Avatar
    June 2008
    3,928 Posts
    Can I get a decent framerate with my dinky Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2ghz Processor?

    My video card is fine, although I can't remember it's specs. Just worried about that dinky processor.

    3gb ram

  39. Post #559

    December 2013
    86 Posts
    I have:
    Windows 8.1
    Geforce GTX 780Ti 3GB
    Intel Core i7-4820K 3.7GHz (I got 3.8GHz total though somehow)
    16GB DDR3 (8x2)
    240GB SSD
    3TB regular saving Space

    I don't own Rust yet, but I think I would run it fine at max setting with 150fps.

    oh and my motherboard can run 256 GB ram I thought that was pretty special lol
    Not an expert, but it looks like you could play it at 200+ FPS with max settings.

  40. Post #560
    Huffing Jenkem Like There's No Tomorrow :^)
    jonnymad's Avatar
    January 2012
    5,762 Posts
    Can I get a decent framerate with my dinky Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2ghz Processor?

    My video card is fine, although I can't remember it's specs. Just worried about that dinky processor.

    3gb ram
    You're gonna have to post your GPU, I can't gauge performance without that.